Structured Nutritional Data & Citations
SECTION 1: Apricot (Prunus armeniaca) - Nutritional and Physical Profile
Nutritional Composition
| Nutrient Category | Per 100g (Raw, Edible Portion) | Per Standard Serving (1 Medium Fruit, ~35g) | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Energy | 48 | 17 | kcal |
| Protein | 1.4 | 0.5 | g |
| Carbohydrates | 11.1 | 3.9 | g |
| - Dietary Fiber | 2.0 | 0.7 | g |
| - Total Sugars | 9.2 | 3.2 | g |
| Total Fat | 0.4 | 0.1 | g |
Key Micronutrients (Per 100g)
- Vitamins:
- Vitamin A (as Beta-carotene): ~1926 IU (578 mcg RAE) - Excellent source
- Vitamin C: ~10 mg
- Vitamin E: ~0.9 mg
- Vitamin K: ~3.3 mcg
- Folate (B9): ~9 mcg
- Niacin (B3): ~0.6 mg
- Pantothenic Acid (B5): ~0.24 mg
- Minerals:
- Potassium: ~259 mg - Good source
- Copper: ~0.08 mg
- Manganese: ~0.07 mg
- Iron: ~0.4 mg
- Magnesium: ~10 mg
- Antioxidants & Phytonutrients:
- Carotenoids: Beta-carotene, Lutein, Zeaxanthin
- Flavonoids: Quercetin, Catechins, Chlorogenic acids
Functional Impact
- Glycemic Index (GI): Low (typically 32-40 for fresh apricots).
- Glycemic Load (GL): Low (approx. 3-5 per 1 medium fruit).
- Satiety Score: Moderate, attributed to its fiber content and high water volume, contributing to a sense of fullness despite lower caloric density.
Physical Properties
- Density: Approximately 0.95 g/cm³ (for fresh, ripe fruit flesh).
- Volumetric Contraction (after cooking/drying):
- Stewing/Jam Preparation: ~30-50% volume reduction due to water loss and breakdown of cellular structure.
- Drying: Significant reduction, often 80-90% of fresh volume, resulting in highly concentrated nutrients and sugars per unit volume.
Citations & References
- USDA FoodData Central, SR Legacy. FDC ID: 170068. "Apricots, raw." U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service. Retrieved from: https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/170068/nutrients (Access date: [Current Date])
- Atkinson, F. S., Foster-Powell, K., & Brand-Miller, J. C. (2008). International Tables of Glycemic Index and Glycemic Load Values: 2008. Diabetes Care, 31(12), 2281-2283.
- Relevant nutritional science consensus on food density and cooking effects.
Field Notes: Dr. Aria Vance
Subject: Apricot
Focus: Volumetric expansion/contraction, historical context, tracking challenges.
SECTION 2: Why Apricot Is Difficult to Track
Dr. Aria Vance, Lead Nutrition Data Scientist, NutriSnap.
Journal Entry: October 26, 2023
Apricots. A deceptively simple fruit, yet a botanical enigma for accurate dietary tracking. Seriously. This small, fuzzy orb is a nutritional chameleon. We often romanticize its journey from ancient Central Asia, blooming along the Silk Road, a golden promise of spring. The Romans called them praecocia—early ripeners. They carried them, dried them, savored them. Across countless cultures, from Persian stews to Turkish jams, this fruit holds immense culinary and historical weight. But quantifying it? Utterly maddening.
Think about it. A "medium" apricot. What is medium? Is it a golf ball-sized Turkish variety, dense and sweet? Or a plump, juicy Californian specimen, twice the size? There's no standardized apricot. One can fluctuate wildly in water content, sugar levels, even fiber density depending on ripeness. An unripe apricot is practically a different food from one bursting with sugary juice.
Then there’s the preparation. Fresh? Easy enough if you weigh it, minus the pit, which no one actually does consistently. But dried apricots? A whole different beast. Their water content is decimated, concentrating sugars and calories into a dense, chewy nugget. People grab a "handful." What's a handful? For some, it's three. For others, it's twenty. Even within the "dried" category, you have varieties—sulfured, unsulfured, organic, conventional—each with subtle differences in residual moisture or additives. And don't get me started on stewed apricots, or apricot jam, where added sugars and altered textures make volumetric measurement a total farce.
The sheer variability makes manual logging a nightmare. Barcode scanning doesn't help with raw produce, and even with packaged products, it simplifies the apricot into a generic average. Cups, scales, they demand a level of meticulousness most users simply can't maintain. They're tedious. They interrupt the flow of life. I’ve seen data sets where users log “1 apricot” for everything from a tiny wild variety to a massive stewed half. It's a gaping hole in our dietary precision.
Then, NutriSnap. Forensic visual analysis. Revolutionary. We’re not just guessing anymore. Our AI looks. It discerns. It estimates variety, ripeness, volume, even the nuanced impact of preparation, all from a simple photo. It’s like having a tiny, hyper-trained nutritionist in your pocket, solving the apricot puzzle, and so many others, with astonishing accuracy. Finally, the true story of the apricot can be told. Every golden, fuzzy nuance captured.
Explore More Research
Tired of Manual Tracking?
Stop scanning barcodes and guessing portion sizes. NutriSnap uses forensic AI to track your macros instantly from a single photo.