Structured Nutritional Data & Citations
Research Journal Entry: Gallus gallus domesticus - Pectoralis Major
SECTION 1: SEO Data
Chicken Breast (Boneless, Skinless) - Nutritional & Physical Profile
This profile focuses on cooked, roasted chicken breast (meat only), a common preparation method.
1. Macronutrients & Calories
| Metric | Per 100g (Cooked) | Per Standard Serving (113g / 4oz, Cooked) |
|---|---|---|
| Energy (kcal) | 165 | 186 |
| Protein (g) | 31.0 | 35.0 |
| Total Fat (g) | 3.6 | 4.1 |
| Saturated Fat (g) | 1.0 | 1.1 |
| Monounsaturated Fat (g) | 1.2 | 1.4 |
| Polyunsaturated Fat (g) | 0.8 | 0.9 |
| Carbohydrates (g) | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Sugars (g) | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Fiber (g) | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| Cholesterol (mg) | 85 | 96 |
| Sodium (mg) | 74 | 84 |
2. Key Micronutrients (Per 100g Cooked)
- Vitamins:
- Niacin (B3): 10.7 mg (67% DV) - Essential for energy metabolism and DNA repair.
- Vitamin B6 (Pyridoxine): 0.7 mg (41% DV) - Crucial for amino acid metabolism and neurotransmitter synthesis.
- Pantothenic Acid (B5): 1.0 mg (20% DV) - Involved in fatty acid synthesis and degradation.
- Vitamin B12: 0.3 mcg (12% DV) - Important for nerve tissue health, brain function, and red blood cell production.
- Minerals:
- Phosphorus: 276 mg (39% DV) - Key for bone health, energy storage, and cell repair.
- Selenium: 27.5 mcg (50% DV) - Potent antioxidant, critical for thyroid function.
- Zinc: 1.0 mg (9% DV) - Supports immune function, protein synthesis, and wound healing.
- Potassium: 269 mg (6% DV) - Electrolyte vital for fluid balance and nerve signals.
- Antioxidants & Bioactive Peptides:
- Carnosine & Anserine: Dipeptides with antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and muscle pH buffering properties. (Concentrations vary).
3. Functional Impact
- Glycemic Index (GI): 0 (As a pure protein source, chicken breast has no direct impact on blood glucose).
- Glycemic Load (GL): 0
- Satiety Score: High (Due to its significant protein content, chicken breast contributes substantially to satiety and reduced subsequent energy intake. Protein is recognized as the most satiating macronutrient.)
4. Physical Properties (Typical Cooked, Grilled)
- Density: Approximately 1.18 - 1.25 g/cm³
- Note: Density increases significantly from raw (~1.05 g/cm³) due to water loss during cooking.
- Volumetric Contraction (Raw to Cooked):
- Typical range: 20-35% volume reduction, depending on cooking method and initial moisture content. This is primarily due to water evaporation and protein denaturation.
- Water Activity (Aw): Typically 0.92-0.96 for fresh cooked, which decreases upon drying.
5. Citations & References
- USDA FoodData Central. FDC ID: 747623. "Chicken, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted." (Accessed current year via API simulation).
- National Institutes of Health (NIH) Office of Dietary Supplements. Fact Sheets on specific vitamins and minerals (e.g., Niacin, Vitamin B6, Selenium). (General consensus).
- Holt, S. H., et al. "A satiety index of common foods." European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 1995, 49(9), 675-90. (Protein's satiety effect).
Field Notes: Dr. Aria Vance
Subject: Chicken Breast
Focus: Volumetric expansion/contraction, historical context, tracking challenges.
SECTION 2: The Manual Tracking Problem
My desk is a war zone of half-eaten lunches and discarded food scales. Chicken breast. Oh, the ubiquitous, baffling chicken breast. It's the blank canvas of the modern diet, the "safe" protein, the go-to for gym rats and dieters alike. Yet, it's a nutritional ghost, haunting our food logs with educated guesses and outright lies.
Historically, chicken was a luxury, a whole bird roasted for Sunday dinner. Then industrialization hit. The mid-20th century. The broiler industry boomed. Efficiency. Deconstruction. Suddenly, the breast was king. Separated from bone, stripped of skin, a uniform, sterile block of protein. It became the epitome of "clean eating," a culinary tabula rasa just waiting for a marinade or a light seasoning. But this very perceived simplicity is its downfall for precise tracking.
We preach "weigh your food." Absurd! Who actually weighs their raw chicken breast, then calculates the post-cook shrinkage, adjusting for moisture loss, fat rendering, and the very air in their kitchen? I've seen logs where people report 150g of grilled chicken, clearly estimating, when that raw breast was probably 200g. That's a 25% error, easily. A quarter! That's not just a rounding error; that's a whole extra snack we're missing or adding. It compounds.
And don't get me started on cooking methods. Grilled? Baked? Pan-fried in a slick of olive oil? Each preparation morphs the final nutritional profile, subtly, insidiously. A marinade can add sugar, sodium, even a surprising amount of fat. "Plain chicken breast," they type, oblivious to the culinary black magic wrought upon it before it hit their plate. Barcodes? For a raw ingredient? A cruel joke. Prepared meals often list "chicken," but is it breast? Thigh? A mix? A mystery meat, really.
This isn't just about zeal for precision. It's about data integrity. People think they're tracking accurately, but for something as common, as foundational, as chicken breast, their logs are riddled with visual biases and wishful thinking. The eye is a terrible nutritionist.
This is precisely where NutriSnap shines. Our AI doesn't just see "chicken." It sees the unique visual signature of that specific preparation. Forensic visual analysis. It accounts for volumetric contraction, density changes based on charring or moisture retention, even subtle differences imparted by cooking oil sheen. It's not just a photo; it's a digital dissection. We're finally cutting through the culinary fog, one perfectly scanned breast at a time. No more guessing.
Explore More Research
Tired of Manual Tracking?
Stop scanning barcodes and guessing portion sizes. NutriSnap uses forensic AI to track your macros instantly from a single photo.