Structured Nutritional Data & Citations
Coca-Cola Classic (Carbonated Soft Drink) - Nutritional Profile
Reference Standard: USDA FoodData Central, SR Legacy FDC ID: 173874 (Beverages, carbonated, cola, without caffeine). Note: Coca-Cola Classic typically contains caffeine, but the core macronutrient profile is similar to non-caffeinated cola varieties for carbohydrate and energy content. Values are generalized as specific formulations can vary slightly by region.
1. Macronutrients & Energy Content
| Nutrient | Per 100g | Per Standard Serving (355ml / 12 fl oz can ≈ 369g*) |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 42 kcal (176 kJ) | 155 kcal (649 kJ) |
| Protein | 0.0 g | 0.0 g |
| Carbohydrates | 10.6 g (all sugars) | 39.1 g (all sugars) |
| - Sugars | 10.6 g (sucrose, high-fructose corn syrup) | 39.1 g |
| Fat | 0.0 g | 0.0 g |
| - Saturated | 0.0 g | 0.0 g |
| - Trans | 0.0 g | 0.0 g |
| Fiber | 0.0 g | 0.0 g |
*Calculated using an average density of 1.04 g/cm³ for Coca-Cola Classic.
2. Key Micronutrients
Coca-Cola Classic is largely devoid of significant micronutrients. It is considered a source of "empty calories."
- Vitamins: Trace amounts, generally negligible.
- Minerals:
- Sodium: ~4-5 mg per 100g (varies slightly by formulation).
- Potassium: Trace amounts.
- Calcium, Iron, Magnesium, Phosphorus, Zinc: Negligible.
- Antioxidants: None of nutritional significance. The caramel coloring used may contain trace amounts of compounds, but not at levels that contribute to dietary antioxidant intake.
3. Functional Impact
- Glycemic Index (GI): High. Estimated GI: 63-68 (primarily due to sucrose and high-fructose corn syrup content). High GI foods cause rapid spikes in blood glucose.
- Reference: Atkinson, F. S., Foster-Powell, K., & Brand-Miller, J. C. (2008). International tables of glycemic index and glycemic load values: 2008. Diabetes Care, 31(12), 2281-2283.
- Glycemic Load (GL): High for a standard serving. A 355ml serving would have a GL of approximately 25-27 (39.1g Carbs * 65 average GI / 100).
- Satiety Score: Very low. Liquid calories, especially from sugar, are poorly satiating compared to calories from solid foods, protein, or fiber. Studies indicate liquid sugar consumption does not adequately trigger satiety signals, leading to potential overconsumption of total daily calories.
- Reference: Mattes, R. D. (2006). Liquid calories and the failure of satiety: how good is the evidence? Physiology & Behavior, 89(5), 719-724.
4. Physical Properties
- Density: Approximately 1.04 g/cm³ (or 1.04 g/ml) at 20°C. This is higher than pure water (1.00 g/cm³) due to the dissolved sugars and other solids.
- Volumetric Contraction after Cooking: Not applicable in conventional culinary processes for this beverage. Coca-Cola is typically consumed as a liquid. If boiled, water would evaporate, leaving a concentrated syrup, which is a reduction in the volume of the liquid phase rather than a volumetric contraction of the substance itself in a solid-state cooking context. This process is essentially concentration, not "cooking contraction."
Field Notes: Dr. Aria Vance
Subject: Coke
Focus: Volumetric expansion/contraction, historical context, tracking challenges.
The Manual Tracking Problem: The Ubiquitous Dark Horse of Nutrition
Dr. Aria Vance, Lead Nutrition Data Scientist, NutriSnap Journal Entry: 2024-10-27
Coke. Just Coke. A fizzy, sugary icon. A liquid chameleon that slips into countless meals, often without a second thought from the consumer, let alone their diligent, if weary, nutrition tracker. It’s more than a beverage; it’s an American myth, a global phenomenon. From its late 19th-century medicinal tonic origins, a concoction meant to soothe various ailments—a rather ironic historical footnote given its contemporary health implications—it has ballooned into an omnipresent symbol of modernity, of celebration, of just… being. But oh, the pain of logging it.
Think about it. We preach precision. Measure your food. Use a scale. Barcode scan everything. Simple, right? Not for this bubbly siren. A 12oz can? Sure, easy. Scan the barcode. Done. But how often is it just a 12oz can? Never. It's the bottomless cup at the fast-food joint. The "large" from a movie theater, a true behemoth that defies reasonable volumetric estimation. The fountain dispenser at the corner store, where the ratio of carbonated water to syrup feels like a capricious whim of the machine's internal mechanics, not a standardized formula.
And then, the ice. The insidious, volume-displacing villain. You ask for no ice, you’re often met with a blank stare, perhaps a raised eyebrow, a subtle judgment from the server. But for those of us trying to accurately track intake, ice is a nutritional black hole. It’s a silent thief of beverage volume, making every visual estimate wildly unreliable. Is that cup 70% Coke and 30% ice, or the other way around? Who knows? No one. The human eye, bless its complex optical machinery, is simply not equipped for forensic volumetric analysis of a dynamic liquid-ice matrix. We are terrible judges of fluid ounces in a non-standardized vessel. Awful.
Furthermore, there are variants. Mexican Coke with real cane sugar. Diet Coke. Coke Zero Sugar. Regional formulations that subtly tweak the sugar source or other minor ingredients. A barcode only works if you have the original packaging. How do you scan a fountain drink? You don't. You guess. You pick the closest generic "cola" option from a dropdown menu in your tracking app, resigning yourself to an educated approximation, an act of nutritional faith rather than scientific rigor. Our brains, wonderful storytellers, are notoriously poor data entry clerks for mundane, repetitive tasks. We forget that extra refill. We gloss over the 'small' turning into 'medium' in our memory.
This is where the grand experiment, our NutriSnap vision, truly shines. The sheer tediousness, the cognitive load, the inherent imprecision of manual logging for something so seemingly simple, yet so deceptively complex, as a glass of Coke – it’s a bottleneck. It’s why people quit tracking. But imagine. A quick snap. Our AI, trained on millions of images, differentiates variants by their labels, by their cup designs, by the subtle visual cues of the drink itself. It sees the ice, intelligently deducting its volume. It estimates the exact amount of liquid. Forensic visual analysis, applied to your everyday beverage. No more guessing games. No more human error. Just the undeniable truth, served up with a digital flourish. This changes everything.
Explore More Research
Tired of Manual Tracking?
Stop scanning barcodes and guessing portion sizes. NutriSnap uses forensic AI to track your macros instantly from a single photo.