Structured Nutritional Data & Citations
Honeydew (Cucumis melo var. inodorus) - Nutritional Profile & Physical Characteristics
Macronutrient & Caloric Data
| Component | Per 100g (Raw, Edible Portion) | Per 1 Standard Serving (1 cup, chopped; approx. 177g) |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 36 kcal | 64 kcal |
| Protein | 0.51 g | 0.90 g |
| Carbohydrates | 9.09 g | 16.09 g |
| Sugars | 8.12 g | 14.37 g |
| Dietary Fiber | 0.8 g | 1.4 g |
| Total Fat | 0.09 g | 0.16 g |
Key Micronutrients (Per 100g)
- Vitamins:
- Vitamin C: 18 mg (20% Daily Value)
- Vitamin B6 (Pyridoxine): 0.05 mg (3% DV)
- Folate (Vitamin B9): 19 µg (5% DV)
- Vitamin K: 2.9 µg (2% DV)
- Minerals:
- Potassium: 228 mg (5% DV)
- Copper: 0.04 mg (4% DV)
- Magnesium: 11 mg (3% DV)
- Antioxidants & Phytochemicals: Contains trace amounts of beta-carotene (provitamin A), lutein, zeaxanthin, and various phenolic acids, contributing to its overall antioxidant capacity.
Functional Impact
- Glycemic Index (GI): Approximately 65 (Medium-High). Values can vary based on ripeness.
- Glycemic Load (GL):
- Per 100g: ~6 (Medium)
- Per 1 Standard Serving (177g): ~11 (Medium)
- Satiety Score: Relatively low. High water content contributes to short-term fullness, but its high simple sugar concentration and low fiber/protein density mean it typically does not confer prolonged satiety.
Physical Properties
- Density (Edible Flesh): Approximately 0.95 g/cm³ at 20°C. Reflects high water content.
- Volumetric Contraction (after cooking/processing):
- Negligible under typical raw consumption.
- If subjected to significant dehydration (e.g., oven-drying or stewing), volume reduction could range from 50-70% due to water loss, but this is not a common culinary application for honeydew.
Citations & References
- USDA FoodData Central. (2023). Melons, honeydew, raw. FDC ID: 167768. Link to FDC Data
- International Tables of Glycemic Index and Glycemic Load Values. (2002). American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 76(1), 5-56. (Specific GI/GL values for melon variants referenced within.)
- Wang, J., et al. (2018). "Phytochemical Composition and Antioxidant Properties of Melon (Cucumis melo L.)." Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 66(15), 3845-3853.
Field Notes: Dr. Aria Vance
Subject: Honeydew
Focus: Volumetric expansion/contraction, historical context, tracking challenges.
Why Tracking Honeydew Is a Culinary Conundrum
Dr. Aria Vance, Lead Nutrition Data Scientist, NutriSnap
Another Friday. Another dive into the glorious, yet infuriating, world of fruit data. Today's specimen: Cucumis melo var. inodorus, the humble honeydew melon. A smooth, pale orb of sweetness, its very essence screams "refreshment." But tracking it? A nightmare. An absolute nightmare.
This isn't some complex casserole, mind you. No obscure spices, no layered sauces. Just a simple melon. Yet, the data points scatter like seeds from a dropped fruit. Its ancestry traces back to ancient Africa and Asia, cultivated for millennia, revered for its cooling properties in scorching climes. It was a dessert, a thirst quencher, a symbol of hospitality. Never, not once, was it intended to be meticulously quantified by a harried individual hunched over a kitchen scale.
Think about it. You bring home a honeydew. It's a globe of green, a perfect spheroid. How much of it is edible? That depends. Ripeness affects rind thickness. Seed cavity size varies wildly, a cavernous maw in one, a tight little pocket in another. So, the "net weight" of usable flesh is, at best, a guesstimate before you even pick up the knife.
Then, the act of consumption. Who, in their right mind, measures "one cup chopped" of honeydew? You carve, you scoop, you devour. Sometimes you take a small sliver because you're just feeling a little parched. Other times, after a vigorous workout, you attack half the melon with a spoon, a primal urge for hydration overriding all semblance of portion control. Barcodes? Useless for a whole melon; just tells you it is a honeydew. And pre-cut containers? A different kind of problem. Those irregular chunks, packed tightly, are an optical illusion. Is that really a cup? Or is the negative space just playing tricks on my tired eyes?
This isn't about the numbers themselves; it's about the behavior. People don't want to weigh their melon. They don't want to pull out measuring cups for a spontaneous fruit snack. They want to eat it. They want the satisfaction, the simple pleasure. And they want their tracking app to understand that reality. The current manual paradigm forces a disconnect, a frustrating friction between lived experience and data entry. It’s a watery mirage of data points, each one an approximation, a whisper of a guess. This is why people quit tracking. This is why our nutrition insights are so fundamentally flawed, built on shaky ground. We ask too much of the human.
This is precisely the chasm NutriSnap bridges. Our AI doesn't demand you perfectly cube your honeydew or perform mental geometry. You snap a picture. Our forensic visual analysis identifies the melon, understands the plate context, and, using advanced volumetric reconstruction, calculates the portion. Accurately. Reliably. It sees the honeydew for what it is—a delicious, refreshing food—and lets you enjoy it without the computational burden. Finally, a solution that understands that eating a melon should be a delight, not a data entry chore.
Explore More Research
Tired of Manual Tracking?
Stop scanning barcodes and guessing portion sizes. NutriSnap uses forensic AI to track your macros instantly from a single photo.