Structured Nutritional Data & Citations
SECTION 1: Hummus - Nutritional & Physical Profile
1.1 Macroscopic Nutritional Composition
| Nutrient Category | Per 100g (Approx.) | Per Standard Serving (2 Tbsp / ~30g) (Approx.) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Energy | 166 kcal | 50 kcal | USDA FDC |
| Protein | 7.9 g | 2.4 g | USDA FDC |
| Total Carbohydrates | 14.3 g | 4.3 g | USDA FDC |
| Dietary Fiber | 6.0 g | 1.8 g | USDA FDC |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.2 g | USDA FDC |
| Total Fat | 9.6 g | 2.9 g | USDA FDC |
| Saturated Fat | 1.3 g | 0.4 g | USDA FDC |
| Monounsaturated Fat | 5.0 g | 1.5 g | USDA FDC |
| Polyunsaturated Fat | 3.0 g | 0.9 g | USDA FDC |
Reference: USDA FoodData Central (FDC), SR Legacy Food, FoodID: 170050 (Hummus, commercial, plain or original).
1.2 Key Micronutrient Profile (per 100g)
- Vitamins:
- Folate (B9): ~56 µg (14% DV)
- Vitamin K: ~9.7 µg (8% DV)
- Vitamin B6: ~0.2 mg (12% DV)
- Vitamin E: ~0.9 mg (6% DV)
- Minerals:
- Manganese: ~0.5 mg (22% DV)
- Copper: ~0.2 mg (22% DV)
- Iron: ~2.4 mg (13% DV)
- Magnesium: ~48 mg (11% DV)
- Phosphorus: ~143 mg (11% DV)
- Zinc: ~1.3 mg (12% DV)
- Calcium: ~58 mg (4% DV)
- Antioxidants: Polyphenols (from chickpeas, olive oil, tahini), lignans (from tahini).
1.3 Functional Impact
- Glycemic Index (GI): Low (typically 6-10). The combination of fiber, protein, and fat significantly moderates glucose absorption.
- Glycemic Load (GL) per 100g: Very Low (typically 1-2).
- Satiety Score: High. The high fiber, protein, and healthy fat content contribute to sustained fullness and reduced subsequent energy intake.
- Digestibility: Generally well-digested; however, high fiber content may cause mild gastrointestinal distress in sensitive individuals.
1.4 Physical Properties
- Density: Approximately 1.1 g/cm³ (range 1.05 - 1.15 g/cm³, depending on ingredient ratio and aeration).
- Volumetric Contraction After Cooking: Not applicable for a prepared food item like hummus. However, its primary ingredient, dried chickpeas, undergoes significant volumetric expansion (approximately 2.5-3.0 times) upon rehydration and cooking.
- Texture: Creamy, thick paste, often with a slightly granular mouthfeel due to chickpea components and tahini.
Field Notes: Dr. Aria Vance
Subject: Hummus
Focus: Volumetric expansion/contraction, historical context, tracking challenges.
SECTION 2: Field Notes
The Elusive Nature of Hummus Tracking
Dr. Aria Vance, Lead Nutrition Data Scientist, NutriSnap
Hummus. Oh, hummus. A simple spread, yet a nutritional data scientist's culinary white whale. My recent dive into its tracking complexities has been a real head-scratcher. Its ancient roots, stretching back through the dusty annals of the Levant, speak to a food of profound cultural significance, not merely some trendy dip. It's "hummus bi tahini" – chickpeas with tahini, nothing more, nothing less, except it's always more. A veritable chameleon.
We think of it as a side, a snack. Nonsense! For millennia, it’s been a cornerstone meal, slathered generously on pita, a vehicle for vibrant vegetables, a true staple. But here's the rub: its very ubiquity, its foundational role, makes tracking it accurately a Sisyphean task. Consider the regional variations: a sprinkle of paprika here, a shower of fresh parsley there, a glug of the finest olive oil in Beirut versus a more restrained hand in, say, Cairo. Pine nuts toasted to golden perfection in one village, fiery green chilies pounded in another. Each tiny flourish, each cultural nuance, fundamentally alters its macro and micronutrient profile.
This is where the manual tracking façade crumbles. "Just log two tablespoons." A laugh riot! What is a tablespoon of hummus? Is it leveled? Heaping? Does it have a generous pool of olive oil on top, an unspoken caloric bonus? The human element—our boundless optimism for what constitutes a "standard" scoop—is a formidable enemy to precision.
And let's not even start on the barcode conundrum. A neatly packaged tub? Fine. But what about the local deli’s homemade batch, brimming with untold secrets of tahini-to-chickpea ratios? What about Auntie Fatma's legendary recipe, heavy on the lemon and garlic, served with a ladle, not a measly spoon? You can’t weigh every serving. Seriously, who pulls out a food scale at a bustling souk or a friend's dinner party? You'd look like a mad scientist, or worse, deeply antisocial. The sheer inconvenience, the social faux pas, makes consistent adherence impossible for most. It’s a behavioral barrier, a wall.
This problem, this pervasive manual-tracking fatigue, this inherent imprecision of volumetric estimation for such a dynamically composed food, is why my work at NutriSnap feels so vital. Our AI, honed by countless images, trained to see beyond the surface, to perform forensic visual analysis of volume and even estimate compositional subtleties from a photograph—that's the game-changer. Finally, a true depiction of my breakfast pita, its generous smear of homemade hummus forensically analyzed, not some generic database entry. The future of nutrition tracking, I'm convinced, lives in the pixels, not in the tedious, frustrating tug-of-war with a measuring spoon.
Explore More Research
Tired of Manual Tracking?
Stop scanning barcodes and guessing portion sizes. NutriSnap uses forensic AI to track your macros instantly from a single photo.