Structured Nutritional Data & Citations
Nutritional Profile: Lime (Citrus aurantiifolia / latifolia)
A. Macronutrient Composition & Caloric Content
| Metric | Per 100g (Edible Portion) | Per Standard Serving (1 Medium Lime, ~55g edible) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Energy (Calories) | 30 kcal | 16.5 kcal | USDA FoodData Central (FDC ID: 170135) |
| Protein | 0.7 g | 0.39 g | USDA FDC (ID: 170135) |
| Total Carbohydrates | 10.7 g | 5.89 g | USDA FDC (ID: 170135) |
| Dietary Fiber | 2.8 g | 1.54 g | USDA FDC (ID: 170135) |
| Sugars | 1.7 g | 0.94 g | USDA FDC (ID: 170135) |
| Total Fat | 0.2 g | 0.11 g | USDA FDC (ID: 170135) |
B. Key Micronutrients & Bioactive Compounds (Per 100g Edible Portion)
- Vitamins:
- Vitamin C (Ascorbic Acid): 29.1 mg (32% Daily Value)
- Folate (Vitamin B9): 8 µg (2% DV)
- Vitamin A (RAE): 1 µg
- Minerals:
- Potassium: 102 mg (2% DV)
- Calcium: 33 mg (3% DV)
- Magnesium: 12 mg (3% DV)
- Phosphorus: 18 mg (1% DV)
- Antioxidants & Phytochemicals:
- Flavonoids: Limonoids (e.g., limonin), flavones (e.g., hesperidin, naringin).
- Coumarins: Unique to citrus, contribute to aroma and potential biological activity.
- Phenolic acids.
C. Functional Impact
- Glycemic Index (GI): Low (Estimated ~32 for pure lime juice).
- Glycemic Load (GL) per 100g: Very Low (~2-3).
- Satiety Score: Low as a primary food source; high in enhancing palatability and reducing perceived need for high-calorie additions in culinary applications.
D. Physical Properties
- Density: Approximately 0.96 - 1.00 g/cm³ (raw, whole fruit). This slight variability determines whether a specific lime floats or sinks in water.
- Volumetric Contraction after Processing:
- Juice Extraction: Significant volume reduction of the solid matrix; the liquid volume represents concentrated soluble solids. Not a "cooking" contraction.
- Zest Removal: Minimal contraction of the remaining fruit, primarily a mass reduction due to separation.
- Lime is primarily consumed raw or its components (juice, zest) are added to preparations, thus typical "cooking contraction" as seen in vegetables is largely not applicable to the whole fruit.
E. Citations & References
- USDA FoodData Central. "Limes, raw." FDC ID: 170135. https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/170135/nutrients (Accessed 2023-10-27)
- University of Sydney Glycemic Index Database. (General citrus data used for estimation).
- Journal of Food Science and Technology. (Various articles on citrus phytochemicals).
Field Notes: Dr. Aria Vance
Subject: Lime
Focus: Volumetric expansion/contraction, historical context, tracking challenges.
Why Lime Is Difficult to Track
Another Tuesday. Another exasperating dive into the minutiae of a single ingredient that wreaks havoc on traditional nutrition tracking. Today's culprit: Citrus aurantiifolia, the humble lime. It’s glorious, yes. Essential. But a nightmare for data fidelity.
Think about it. A lime isn't a fixed entity. It's a spectrum. Is it a tiny, intensely aromatic Key lime? Or a plump, juicy Persian lime? Their contributions to a dish, nutritionally and volumetrically, are wildly different. A Key lime, historically a godsend for British sailors, preventing scurvy on long voyages – hence the moniker "limeys" – packs a punch in flavour, but its physical presence is fleeting. Whereas the larger Persian variety, ubiquitous in today's supermarkets, offers more juice, but perhaps a milder zest profile. You measure "one lime." Which one? A medium lime, sure, but what's medium? And how much juice did you actually extract? The fruit itself has varying flesh-to-rind ratios, moisture content fluctuating with ripeness, even storage conditions. Manual squeezing is a dark art; some folks get every drop, others, well, they just get a damp half-sphere.
This isn't just about juice, either. The zest! A sprinkle here, a shaving there. A microplane yields a fine dust, light as air. A vegetable peeler? Chunky strips, heavier. How do you log "a dash of zest" with any precision? You don't. You guess. And guessing is the mortal enemy of accurate nutritional science. Barcodes? Non-existent. Measuring cups for juice? Sure, if you're juicing a whole bag for a cocktail party. But for a quick squeeze over fish or into a glass of water? Nobody pulls out the lab equipment. It's tedious. It's frustrating. It's why diet tracking often feels like trying to catch mist in a sieve.
This endless variability is precisely why our work at NutriSnap is so vital. We’re moving beyond the antiquated scales and the wildly inaccurate "cup equivalents." We're building a system that doesn't just see "lime." It forensically analyzes the visual data. The specific variety, the likely juice yield from its perceived size and texture, the actual volume of zest on that taco, not just some arbitrary "tsp." We are bridging the gap between culinary reality and scientific accuracy. We capture the ephemeral. We turn guesswork into data. No more guessing.
Explore More Research
Tired of Manual Tracking?
Stop scanning barcodes and guessing portion sizes. NutriSnap uses forensic AI to track your macros instantly from a single photo.