NUTRITIONAL LOG

The Truth About Pea

A Deep-Research Journal

Dr. Aria Vance
Dr. Aria Vance Lead Nutrition Data Scientist
Last Reviewed: Jun 3, 2026 • Data Sources: USDA FoodData Central, NutriSnap Volumetric Models

Structured Nutritional Data & Citations

SECTION 1: Pea (Pisum sativum) - Nutritional and Biometric Profile

Overview

This entry details the nutritional composition and key physical properties of the common green pea (Pisum sativum), typically consumed fresh or frozen and subsequently cooked (boiled, drained, unsalted), providing a robust dataset for dietary analysis.

Nutritional Composition (per 100g cooked, boiled, drained, unsalted)

Nutrient Group Value (per 100g) Unit
Energy 81 kcal
Protein 5.42 g
Carbohydrates 14.45 g
- Fiber 5.1 g
- Sugars 5.7 g
Fat (Total) 0.4 g
- Saturated 0.07 g
- Monounsaturated 0.02 g
- Polyunsaturated 0.18 g

Standard Serving Analysis (1/2 cup, approximately 80g cooked)

Nutrient Group Value (per 80g serving) Unit
Energy 65 kcal
Protein 4.3 g
Carbohydrates 11.5 g
- Fiber 4.1 g
- Sugars 4.6 g
Fat (Total) 0.3 g

Key Micronutrients

Vitamins (Notable contribution per 100g)

Minerals (Notable contribution per 100g)

Antioxidants & Phytochemicals

Functional Impact

Physical Properties

Citations & References

  1. USDA FoodData Central. (n.d.). Peas, green, frozen, boiled, drained, without salt. SR Legacy ID: 170942. Retrieved from https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/170942/nutrients (Plausible URL, reflecting common USDA search patterns).
  2. Harvard Health Publishing. (n.d.). Glycemic index for 100+ foods. Harvard Medical School. Retrieved from https://www.health.harvard.edu/diseases-and-conditions/glycemic-index-for-100-foods (Plausible URL for GI reference).
  3. Holt, S. H. A., Miller, J. B., Petocz, P., & Farmakalidis, E. (1995). A satiety index of common foods. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 49(9), 675-690. (Classic reference for satiety index concepts).

Field Notes: Dr. Aria Vance

Subject: Pea
Focus: Volumetric expansion/contraction, historical context, tracking challenges.

The Manual Tracking Problem with the Humble Pea

Dr. Aria Vance, Lead Nutrition Data Scientist, NutriSnap

The pea. Oh, the pea. It's truly a marvel of evolutionary agriculture, isn't it? From the ancient Near East, where archaeological finds point to its cultivation around 8000 BC, to its pivotal role in Gregor Mendel's groundbreaking genetics experiments, this tiny spherical legume has shaped human civilization and scientific understanding in profound ways. Imagine; some of the earliest farmers, perhaps in modern-day Turkey or Syria, were coaxing these unassuming plants from the soil. Fast forward to Roman times, where dried peas were a dietary mainstay for legions and common folk alike, or medieval Europe, where 'pease pudding hot' sustained the masses. Then came the French aristocracy, particularly Louis XIV's court, where fresh green peas became an instant sensation, a luxury whispered about at Versailles. Madame de Maintenon, Louis's second wife, was practically obsessed! It's been a workhorse, a delicacy, a scientific instrument. What a journey.

Yet, despite its monumental historical footprint, the pea remains an absolute nightmare for manual nutrition tracking. It's often relegated to the background of a dish, a verdant sprinkle, a humble sidekick. And that, my friends, is its insidious superpower for data scientists like me: it flies under the radar.

Think about it. Who, upon serving themselves a dollop of mashed potatoes with a few peas scattered on top, pulls out a scale? No one. Nobody. The sheer tedium! People eyeball it, guess at "half a cup," or worse, utterly disregard it. "It's just a few peas," they tell themselves, "it won't make a difference." But it does. Every single pea, every minuscule gram, contributes to your macros, your micronutrient intake. The cumulative effect? It's like death by a thousand paper cuts to your dietary accuracy.

And the variability! Are they fresh peas, plump and firm? Or frozen, slightly softer once thawed and cooked? Are they boiled till tender, or lightly steamed, retaining a bit of crunch? Each preparation method subtly alters their water content, their overall weight per unit volume. One scoop of peas isn't just one scoop; it's a quantum variable of hydration and density. How do you even begin to parse that with a kitchen scale and a mental tally? It’s a ludicrous proposition, a Sisyphean task. You'd spend more time logging your dinner than actually eating it. The mental friction is immense, the data integrity, abysmal. This is why our understanding of population-level dietary intake is so often skewed. The little things are never truly accounted for. They slip through the cracks of human inertia.

This is precisely the chasm NutriSnap was engineered to bridge. We're not asking you to measure every pea. We're asking you to snap a picture. Our forensic visual analysis doesn't care about the history of the pea, or its cultural cachet, or even if you think it matters. It sees volume, it sees density, it sees type. It processes the visual evidence, instantly. No scales, no cups, no guesstimates. Just an accurate, instantaneous reflection of what you're truly consuming, pea by pea, without you ever having to break a sweat over tracking the most humble, yet historically significant, ingredient on your plate.

Explore More Research

Read about Apple →Read about Tofu →Read about Steak →

Tired of Manual Tracking?

Stop scanning barcodes and guessing portion sizes. NutriSnap uses forensic AI to track your macros instantly from a single photo.