Structured Nutritional Data & Citations
Raspberry: Nutritional & Biometric Profile
I. Nutritional Composition (Per 100g & Standard Serving)
Reference: USDA FoodData Central (SR Legacy FDC ID: 170564)
| Nutrient Group | Per 100g (Raw) | Per 1 Standard Serving (1 cup, ~123g) | Unit |
|---|---|---|---|
| Energy | 52 | 64 | kcal |
| Macronutrients | |||
| Protein | 1.2 | 1.5 | g |
| Total Fat | 0.7 | 0.9 | g |
| Saturated Fat | 0.03 | 0.04 | g |
| Polyunsaturated Fat | 0.38 | 0.47 | g |
| Monounsaturated Fat | 0.06 | 0.07 | g |
| Carbohydrates | 11.9 | 14.6 | g |
| Fiber, total dietary | 6.5 | 8.0 | g |
| Sugars, total | 4.4 | 5.4 | g |
II. Key Micronutrients & Bioactive Compounds
- Vitamins:
- Vitamin C (Ascorbic Acid): ~26.2 mg (44% DV per 100g) - Potent antioxidant.
- Vitamin K (Phylloquinone): ~7.8 µg (10% DV per 100g) - Essential for blood clotting and bone health.
- Manganese: ~0.67 mg (34% DV per 100g) - Critical co-factor for various enzymes.
- Folate (Vitamin B9): ~21 µg (5% DV per 100g).
- Minerals:
- Potassium: ~151 mg (3% DV per 100g).
- Magnesium: ~22 mg (6% DV per 100g).
- Copper: ~0.09 mg (10% DV per 100g).
- Antioxidants & Phytonutrients:
- Anthocyanins: Primarily cyanidin-3-glucoside, cyanidin-3-sophoroside – contribute to red color and potent anti-inflammatory effects.
- Ellagic Acid: A powerful phenolic compound associated with anti-cancer properties.
- Quercetin, Gallic Acid, Catechins: Other significant flavonoids and phenolic acids.
III. Functional Impact
- Glycemic Index (GI): Low (~25-30). Raspberries cause a minimal blood glucose response.
- Glycemic Load (GL): Very Low (~2-3 per 100g).
- Satiety Score: High. The substantial fiber content (both soluble and insoluble) promotes prolonged fullness and aids digestive health.
- Digestive Health: High fiber supports gut microbiota diversity and regularity.
IV. Physical Properties
- Density (Fresh, Whole): ~0.35 - 0.45 g/cm³ (due to air pockets and delicate structure).
- Volumetric Contraction (After Cooking/Stewing): Approximately 30-50% reduction in volume. Water loss and structural collapse of drupelets are primary contributors.
- Water Content: ~86% by weight.
V. Citations & References
- USDA FoodData Central. (2019). Raspberries, raw. FDC ID: 170564. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Retrieved from https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/170564/nutrients
- Harvard Health Publishing. (2020). Glycemic index for 60+ foods. Harvard Medical School.
- Rehm, C. D., et al. (2016). Dietary fiber intake and risk of cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis. British Medical Journal, 354, i4207.
- Prior, R. L., et al. (2001). Berry fruits: An excellent source of phytochemicals. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 101(11), 1324-1331.
Field Notes: Dr. Aria Vance
Subject: Raspberry
Focus: Volumetric expansion/contraction, historical context, tracking challenges.
The Elusive Raspberry: A Tracker's Bane
Dr. Aria Vance, Lead Nutrition Data Scientist, NutriSnap.
The humble raspberry. A crimson jewel. Deceptively simple, yet it consistently confounds our best manual tracking efforts. We're talking about a fruit steeped in history, you know? Ancient Greeks revered them; Romans cultivated them. They spread from the foothills of Mount Ida, across Europe, then to the New World. A symbol of tenderness, of passion. And a colossal pain for anyone trying to log their daily intake accurately.
Why? Oh, the reasons are legion. First, their morphology. Irregular! Each berry, an aggregate of tiny drupelets, creating pockets of air. Try to measure a "cup" of raspberries. You're measuring a significant percentage of air, not actual fruit mass. The standard "1 cup" measurement, a pillar of convenience, crumbles under the weight of raspberry reality. A cup of tightly packed berries versus loosely piled ones? Vastly different weights. It's a volumetric nightmare, a nutritional wild card.
Then there's the variability. Size, ripeness, water content—it swings wildly. A supermarket punnet, even from the same batch, will yield berries ranging from plump, juicy globes to smaller, slightly desiccated ones. Cook them down, make a sauce or jam, and what happens? The water evaporates. The volume collapses like a bad soufflé. That initial "serving" is now a completely different beast, calorically concentrated, texturally altered. Good luck back-calculating that with a generic app entry.
We’ve tried it all in the lab. Barcode scanning? Only for packaged fruit, which often includes the punnet weight, skewing data. Weighing scales? Yes, precise. But who, Dr. Vance asks you, is going to weigh every single raspberry before consumption? It’s a tedious, joy-killing ritual. Imagine the dinner table. "Excuse me, darling, before you eat that, I must painstakingly weigh these five berries." It’s absurd. It’s unsustainable. It’s why people quit tracking.
Humans eyeball. We estimate. We guesstimate. And with something as visually varied and physically irregular as a raspberry, our estimations are woefully inaccurate. We crave data, precise data, to understand our dietary patterns, to drive real health outcomes. Yet, manual methods—the scales, the cups, the guesswork—turn nutrient tracking into a chore, an exercise in futility. It leads to frustration, to giving up. And that's exactly why this problem, this persistent, infuriating raspberry problem, pushed us towards NutriSnap. It sees. It analyzes. It quantifies, forensically, from a mere photograph. Finally, a solution for the erratic, the beautiful, the utterly untrackable berry.
Explore More Research
Tired of Manual Tracking?
Stop scanning barcodes and guessing portion sizes. NutriSnap uses forensic AI to track your macros instantly from a single photo.