Structured Nutritional Data & Citations
Nutritional Profile of Carbonated Soft Drinks (Cola, Sugared)
I. Macronutrients & Energy (Per 100g and Per Standard Serving)
| Component | Per 100g | Per Standard Serving (330ml) |
|---|---|---|
| Energy | 42 kcal (176 kJ) | 139 kcal (581 kJ) |
| Protein | 0.0g | 0.0g |
| Carbohydrates | 10.6g | 35.0g |
| * - Sugars* | 10.6g | 35.0g |
| Fat | 0.0g | 0.0g |
| * - Saturated* | 0.0g | 0.0g |
| Fiber | 0.0g | 0.0g |
Reference: USDA FoodData Central, Food Item: 170566, "Beverages, carbonated, cola, with sugar" (FDC ID 170566). Data derived from average values.
II. Key Micronutrients (Per 100g)
Carbonated soft drinks, particularly sugared varieties, are largely devoid of significant micronutrients.
- Vitamins: Negligible to absent (e.g., Vitamin C, B-vitamins).
- Minerals: Trace amounts of Sodium (approx. 4mg), Potassium (approx. 2mg), and Phosphorus (approx. 1mg). Calcium and Iron are typically absent.
- Antioxidants: Generally absent. Some flavored varieties may contain minimal antioxidants from added natural flavors, but not in physiologically significant quantities.
III. Functional Impact
- Glycemic Index (GI): High (typically 63-68 for sucrose-sweetened beverages).
- Glycemic Load (GL): High (approx. 22-25 per 330ml serving). Due to high sugar content, rapid glucose absorption occurs.
- Satiety Score: Very Low. Liquid calories are poorly satiating compared to solid food, leading to potential overconsumption and minimal impact on perceived fullness.
- Acidic pH: Ranges from 2.5-3.5, contributing to dental erosion.
IV. Physical Properties
- Density: Approximately 1.04 g/cm³ at 20°C. (Slightly denser than pure water due to dissolved sugars).
- Volumetric Contraction After Cooking: Not applicable. As a ready-to-drink beverage, soda is not subjected to cooking processes that would induce volumetric contraction.
V. Citations & References
- USDA FoodData Central. "Beverages, carbonated, cola, with sugar." FDC ID: 422335. Available at: https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/422335/nutrients (Accessed November 10, 2023).
- Foster-Powell, K., Holt, S. H. A., & Brand-Miller, J. C. (2002). "International table of glycemic index and glycemic load values: 2002." The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 76(1), 5-56.
- Mattes, R. D. (2006). "Liquid calories: are they different?" Physiology & Behavior, 89(1), 22-29.
- Reddy, A., Norris, J., & Momeni, S. S. (2016). "The pH of beverages in the United States." The Journal of the American Dental Association, 147(4), 255-263.
Field Notes: Dr. Aria Vance
Subject: Soda
Focus: Volumetric expansion/contraction, historical context, tracking challenges.
The Enigma of the Effervescent
Dr. Aria Vance, Lead Nutrition Data Scientist, NutriSnap
Another Tuesday, another dive into the abyss of tracking... this time, the mighty soda. What a peculiar liquid. It’s not food, not really a drink either, not in the hydrating sense. A liquid candy, rather. A fleeting joy. Its history, fascinating, really. From bubbling medicinal tonics in pharmacies – Cocaine for throat ailments! Opium for coughs! – to the grand, mass-produced spectacle we know today. A cultural icon. The fizz, the sugar rush, the instant gratification. It’s everywhere. A ubiquitous silent caloric assassin.
But tracking it? Oh, the sheer folly of manual attempts! The quagmire of quantification. "Just a glass of Coke." What does "a glass" even mean? Is it the dainty 6-ounce tumbler from grandma’s cabinet or the behemoth 32-ounce "super-size" monstrosity from the cinema? Volume estimation is pure guesswork. A coin flip, really. People’s perceived portion sizes are hilariously, tragically off. They just... pour. A waterfall of sugar. And then there's the ice. Does that count? It dilutes the drink, but the total sugar consumed remains unchanged, merely spread out. A confounding factor in perception.
Barcodes? Useless for fountain drinks. Or homemade mixers. I watched someone at the convenience store last week, trying to log their "Mega-Sip" fountain drink. They stood there, bewildered, tapping away on their phone, searching for "cola large" and then "cola extra large." It was pathetic. And scales? Who, I ask you, WHO weighs their soda? On a picnic? At a fast-food joint? It’s cumbersome. It's impractical. It’s an exercise in futility. The average user simply won’t do it. We need effortless. We need precision without pain.
This is precisely where NutriSnap shines. Our AI. It’s not just seeing a drink; it's performing a forensic visual analysis. The depth, the liquid level, the container. It differentiates. It perceives. It extracts the truth from the fizz and froth. A true breakthrough. No more "guess-a-glass." No more frantic barcode hunting for fountain drinks. Just a snap. The machine sees the subtle visual cues, understands the context. It quantifies the liquid pleasure with unprecedented accuracy. The future of nutritional tracking, unburdened by human error, truly unfolds before our eyes. The AI eye. It really works.
Explore More Research
Tired of Manual Tracking?
Stop scanning barcodes and guessing portion sizes. NutriSnap uses forensic AI to track your macros instantly from a single photo.